ABSTRACT
BackgroundInformation about the effectiveness of oral antivirals in preventing short- and long-term COVID-19-related outcomes during the Omicron surge is limited. We sought to determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir for the outpatient treatment of COVID-19. MethodsWe conducted three retrospective target trial emulation studies comparing matched patient cohorts who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus no treatment, molnupiravir versus no treatment, and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus molnupiravir in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Participants were Veterans in VHA care at risk for severe COVID-19 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the outpatient setting during January and February 2022. Primary outcomes included all-cause 30-day hospitalization or death and 31-180-day incidence of acute or long-term care admission, death, or post-COVID-19 conditions. For 30-day outcomes, we calculated unadjusted risk rates, risk differences, and risk ratios. For 31-180-day outcomes, we used unadjusted time-to-event analyses. ResultsParticipants were 90% male with median age 67 years and 26% unvaccinated. Compared to matched untreated controls, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir-treated participants (N=1,587) had a lower 30-day risk of hospitalization (27.10/1000 versus 41.06/1000, risk difference [RD] - 13.97, 95% CI -23.85 to -4.09) and death (3.15/1000 versus 14.86/1000, RD -11.71, 95% CI - 16.07 to -7.35). Among persons who were alive at day 31, further significant reductions in 31-180-day incidence of hospitalization (sub-hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.37) or death (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.08) were not observed. Molnupiravir-treated participants aged [≥]65 years (n=543) had a lower combined 30-day risk of hospitalization or death (55.25/1000 versus 82.35/1000, RD -27.10, 95% CI -50.63 to -3.58). A statistically significant difference in 30-day or 31-180-day risk of hospitalization or death was not observed between matched nirmatrelvir- or molnupiravir-treated participants. Incidence of most post-COVID conditions was similar across comparison groups. ConclusionsNirmatrelvir-ritonavir was highly effective in preventing 30-day hospitalization and death. Short-term benefit from molnupiravir was observed in older groups. Significant reductions in adverse outcomes from 31-180 days were not observed with either antiviral.
ABSTRACT
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSUnderstanding how SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts long-term patient outcomes requires identification of comparable persons with and without infection. We report the design and implementation of a matching strategy employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory (CORC) to develop comparable cohorts of SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected persons for the purpose of inferring potential causative long-term adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Veteran population. MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we identified VA health care system patients who were and were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 on a rolling monthly basis. We generated matched cohorts utilizing a combination of exact and time-varying propensity score matching based on electronic health record (EHR)-derived covariates that can be confounders or risk factors across a range of outcomes. ResultsFrom an initial pool of 126,689,864 person-months of observation, we generated final matched cohorts of 208,536 Veterans infected between March 2020-April 2021 and 3,014,091 uninfected Veterans. Matched cohorts were well-balanced on all 38 covariates used in matching after excluding patients for: no VA health care utilization; implausible age, weight, or height; living outside of the 50 states or Washington, D.C.; prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis per Medicare claims; or lack of a suitable match. Most Veterans in the matched cohort were male (88.3%), non-Hispanic (87.1%), white (67.2%), and living in urban areas (71.5%), with a mean age of 60.6, BMI of 31.3, Gagne comorbidity score of 1.4 and a mean of 2.3 CDC high-risk conditions. The most common diagnoses were hypertension (61.4%), diabetes (34.3%), major depression (32.2%), coronary heart disease (28.5%), PTSD (25.5%), anxiety (22.5%), and chronic kidney disease (22.5%). ConclusionsThis successful creation of matched SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected patient cohorts from the largest integrated health system in the United States will support cohort studies of outcomes derived from EHRs and sample selection for qualitative interviews and patient surveys. These studies will increase our understanding of the long-term outcomes of Veterans who were infected with SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundOlder adults and persons with medical co-morbidities are at increased risk for severe COVID-19. Several pharmacotherapies demonstrated to reduce the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death have been authorized for use. We describe factors associated with receipt of outpatient COVID-19 pharmacotherapies in the Veterans Health Administration. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among Veterans with risk factors for severe COVID-19 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during January and February 2022. We compared receipt of any COVID-19 pharmacotherapy, including sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir, molnupiravir, or remdesivir versus no antiviral or monoclonal antibody treatment according to demographic characteristics, place of residence, underlying medical conditions, and COVID-19 vaccination using multivariable logistic regression. ResultsDuring January and February 2022, 16,546 courses of sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir, and molnupiravir were allocated across the Veterans Health Administration. Among 111,717 Veterans testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 4,233 (3.8%) received any COVID-19 pharmacotherapy, including 2,870 of 92,396 (3.1%) in January and 1,363 of 19,321 (7.1%) in February. Among a subset of 56,206 Veterans with documented COVID-19-related symptoms in the 30 days preceding positive SARS-CoV-2 test, 3,079 of 53,206 (5.5%) received any COVID-19 pharmacotherapy. Untreated Veterans had a median age of 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-71 years) and median 3 underlying medical conditions (IQR 2-5). Veterans receiving any treatment were more likely to be older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-1.80, 65-74 versus 50-64 years; aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.53-1.84 [≥]75 versus 50-64 years) and have a higher number of underlying conditions (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.48-1.79, 3-4 versus 1-2 conditions; aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.98-2.39, [≥]5 versus 1-2 conditions). Persons of Black versus White race (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.72) and well as persons of Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99) were less likely to receive treatment. Conclusions and RelevanceAlthough supply of outpatient COVID-19 pharmacotherapies during January and February 2022 was limited, prescription of these pharmacotherapies was underutilized, consistent with early national patterns in dispensing. Racial and ethnic minorities were less likely to receive any pharmacotherapy.
ABSTRACT
AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe effectiveness of a 3rd mRNA COVID-19 vaccine ("booster") dose against the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is uncertain especially in older, high-risk populations. ObjectiveTo determine mRNA booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and death in the omicron era by type of booster, type of primary vaccine, time since primary vaccine, age and comorbidity burden. DesignTarget trial emulation study comparing booster vaccination versus no booster. SettingU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system Participants and InterventionAmong persons who had received two mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses at least 5 months earlier, we designed this retrospective matched cohort study to emulate a target trial of booster mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) versus no booster, conducted from 12/01/2021 to 03/31/2022. MeasurementsBooster VE. ResultsEach group included 490,838 well-matched persons, predominantly male (88%), mean age 63.0{+/-}14.0 years, followed for up to 121 days (mean 79.8 days). Booster VE >10 days after booster was 42.3% (95% CI 40.6-43.9) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 53.3% (48.1-58.0) against SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization and 79.1% (71.2-84.9) against SARS-CoV-2-related death. Booster VE was similar for different booster types (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), age groups or primary vaccination regimens, but was significantly higher with longer time since primary vaccination and with higher comorbidity burden. LimitationsPredominantly male population. ConclusionsBooster mRNA vaccination was highly effective in preventing death and moderately effective in preventing infection and hospitalization for up to 4 months after administration in the omicron era. Increased uptake of booster vaccination, which is currently suboptimal, should be pursued to limit the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in persons with high comorbidity burden. Primary Funding Source: Department of Veterans Affairs